Network Working Group S. Senum Request for Comments: 1764 DigiBoard Category: Standards Track March 1995
The PPP XNS IDP Control Protocol (XNSCP)
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)  provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, and proposes a family of Network Control Protocols for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols.
This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing and configuring the Xerox Network Systems (XNS) Internet Datagram Protocol (IDP) over PPP.
1. A method for encapsulating multi-protocol datagrams.
2. A Link Control Protocol (LCP) for establishing, configuring, and testing the data-link connection.
3. A family of Network Control Protocols for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols.
In order to establish communications over a point-to-point link, each end of the PPP link must first send LCP packets to configure and test the data link. After the link has been established and optional facilities have been negotiated as needed by the LCP, PPP must send XNSCP packets to choose and configure the XNS IDP network-layer protocol. Once XNSCP has reached the Opened state, XNS IDP datagrams can be sent over the link.
The link will remain configured for communications until explicit LCP or XNSCP packets close the link down, or until some external event occurs (an inactivity timer expires or network administrator intervention).
In this document, several words are used to signify the requirements of the specification. These words are often capitalized.
MUST This word, or the adjective "required", means that the definition is an absolute requirement of the specification.
MUST NOT This phrase means that the definition is an absolute prohibition of the specification.
SHOULD This word, or the adjective "recommended", means that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore this item, but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a different course.
MAY This word, or the adjective "optional", means that this item is one of an allowed set of alternatives. An implementation which does not include this option MUST be prepared to interoperate with another implementation which does include the option.
This document frequently uses the following terms:
datagram The unit of transmission in the network layer (such as IP). A datagram may be encapsulated in one or more packets passed to the data link layer.
frame The unit of transmission at the data link layer. A frame may include a header and/or a trailer, along with some number of units of data.
packet The basic unit of encapsulation, which is passed across the interface between the network layer and the data link layer. A packet is usually mapped to a frame; the exceptions are when data link layer fragmentation is being performed, or when multiple packets are incorporated into a single frame.
peer The other end of the point-to-point link.
silently discard This means the implementation discards the packet without further processing. The implementation SHOULD provide the capability of logging the error, including the contents of the silently discarded packet, and SHOULD record the event in a statistics counter.
The XNS IDP Control Protocol (XNSCP) is responsible for configuring, enabling, and disabling the XNS IDP protocol modules on both ends of the point-to-point link. XNSCP uses the same packet exchange mechanism as the Link Control Protocol (LCP). XNSCP packets may not be exchanged until PPP has reached the Network-Layer Protocol phase. XNSCP packets received before this phase is reached should be silently discarded.
The XNS IDP Control Protocol is exactly the same as the Link Control Protocol  with the following exceptions:
The packet may utilize any modifications to the basic frame format which have been negotiated during the Link Establishment phase.
Senum [Page 3]
RFC 1764 PPP XNSCP March 1995
Data Link Layer Protocol Field
Exactly one XNSCP packet is encapsulated in the Information field of a PPP Data Link Layer frame, where the PPP Protocol field indicates type hex 8025 (XNS IDP Control Protocol).
Only Codes 1 through 7 (Configure-Request, Configure-Ack, Configure-Nak, Configure-Reject, Terminate-Request, Terminate-Ack and Code-Reject) are used. Other Codes should be treated as unrecognized and should result in Code-Rejects.
XNSCP packets may not be exchanged until PPP has reached the Network-Layer Protocol phase. An implementation should be prepared to wait for Authentication and Link Quality Determination to finish before timing out waiting for a Configure-Ack or other response. It is suggested that an implementation give up only after user intervention or a configurable amount of time.
Before any XNS IDP packets may be communicated, PPP must reach the Network-Layer Protocol phase, and the XNS IDP Control Protocol must reach the Opened state.
Exactly one XNS IDP packet is encapsulated in the Information field of a PPP Data Link Layer frame where the Protocol field indicates type hex 0025 (XNS IDP datagram).
The maximum length of a XNS IDP datagram transmitted over a PPP link is the same as the maximum length of the Information field of a PPP data link layer frame. Since there is no standard method for fragmenting and reassembling XNS IDP datagrams, PPP links supporting XNS IDP MUST allow at least 576 octets in the information field of a data link layer frame.
The format of the Information field itself is the same as that defined in .
Senum [Page 4]
RFC 1764 PPP XNSCP March 1995
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
 Simpson, W., "The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)", STD 51, RFC 1661, Daydreamer, July 1994.
 Xerox, "Internet Transport Protocols", January 1991, Order No. XNSS 029101.
Some of the text in this document is taken from previous documents produced by the Point-to-Point Protocol Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
In particular, Bill Simpson provided the boiler-plate used to create this document.
The working group can be contacted via the current chair:
Fred Baker Cisco Systems 519 Lado Drive Santa Barbara, California 93111
Phone: (805) 681-0115 EMail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Questions about this memo can also be directed to:
Steven J. Senum DigiBoard 6400 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344