This document is obsolete. Please
refer to RFC 4314.
Network Working Group J. Myers Request for Comments: 2086 Carnegie Mellon Category: Standards Track January 1997
IMAP4 ACL extension
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
The ACL extension is present in any IMAP4 implementation which returns "ACL" as one of the supported capabilities to the CAPABILITY command.
An access control list is a set of <identifier,rights> pairs.
Identifier is a US-ASCII string. The identifier anyone is reserved to refer to the universal identity (all authentications, including anonymous). All user name strings accepted by the LOGIN or AUTHENTICATE commands to authenticate to the IMAP server are reserved as identifiers for the corresponding user. Identifiers starting with a dash ("-") are reserved for "negative rights", described below. All other identifier strings are interpreted in an implementation- defined manner.
Rights is a string listing a (possibly empty) set of alphanumeric characters, each character listing a set of operations which is being controlled. Letters are reserved for ``standard'' rights, listed below. The set of standard rights may only be extended by a standards-track document. Digits are reserved for implementation or site defined rights. The currently defined standard rights are:
l - lookup (mailbox is visible to LIST/LSUB commands) r - read (SELECT the mailbox, perform CHECK, FETCH, PARTIAL, SEARCH, COPY from mailbox) s - keep seen/unseen information across sessions (STORE SEEN flag) w - write (STORE flags other than SEEN and DELETED) i - insert (perform APPEND, COPY into mailbox) p - post (send mail to submission address for mailbox, not enforced by IMAP4 itself) c - create (CREATE new sub-mailboxes in any implementation-defined hierarchy) d - delete (STORE DELETED flag, perform EXPUNGE) a - administer (perform SETACL)
An implementation may tie rights together or may force rights to always or never be granted to particular identifiers. For example, in an implementation that uses unix mode bits, the rights "wisd" are tied, the "a" right is always granted to the owner of a mailbox and is never granted to another user. If rights are tied in an implementation, the implementation must be conservative in granting rights in response to SETACL commands--unless all rights in a tied set are specified, none of that set should be included in the ACL entry for that identifier. A client may discover the set of rights which may be granted to a given identifier in the ACL for a given mailbox by using the LISTRIGHTS command.
Myers Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 2086 ACL extension January 1997
It is possible for multiple identifiers in an access control list to apply to a given user (or other authentication identity). For example, an ACL may include rights to be granted to the identifier matching the user, one or more implementation-defined identifiers matching groups which include the user, and/or the identifier "anyone". How these rights are combined to determine the user's access is implementation-defined. An implementation may choose, for example, to use the union of the rights granted to the applicable identifiers. An implementation may instead choose, for example, to only use those rights granted to the most specific identifier present in the ACL. A client may determine the set of rights granted to the logged-in user for a given mailbox by using the MYRIGHTS command.
When an identifier in an ACL starts with a dash ("-"), that indicates that associated rights are to be removed from the identifier that is prefixed by the dash. For example, if the identifier "-fred" is granted the "w" right, that indicates that the "w" right is to be removed from users matching the identifier "fred". Implementations need not support having identifiers which start with a dash in ACLs.
Arguments: mailbox name authentication identifier access right modification
Data: no specific data for this command
Result: OK - setacl completed NO - setacl failure: can't set acl BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
The SETACL command changes the access control list on the specified mailbox so that the specified identifier is granted permissions as specified in the third argument.
The third argument is a string containing an optional plus ("+") or minus ("-") prefix, followed by zero or more rights characters. If the string starts with a plus, the following rights are added to any existing rights for the identifier. If the string starts with a minus, the following rights are removed from any existing rights for the identifier. If the string does not start with a plus or minus, the rights replace any existing rights for the identifier.
Data: mailbox name zero or more identifier rights pairs
The ACL response occurs as a result of a GETACL command. The first string is the mailbox name for which this ACL applies. This is followed by zero or more pairs of strings, each pair contains the identifier for which the entry applies followed by the set of rights that the identifier has.
Data: mailbox name identifier required rights list of optional rights
The LISTRIGHTS response occurs as a result of a LISTRIGHTS command. The first two strings are the mailbox name and identifier for which this rights list applies. Following the identifier is a string containing the (possibly empty) set of rights the identifier will always be granted in the mailbox.
Following this are zero or more strings each containing a set of rights the identifier may be granted in the mailbox. Rights mentioned in the same string are tied together--either all must be granted to the identifier in the mailbox or none may be granted.
The same right may not be listed more than once in the LISTRIGHTS command.
The following syntax specification uses the augmented Backus-Naur Form (BNF) notation as specified in [RFC-822] as modified by [IMAP4]. Non-terminals referenced but not defined below are as defined by [IMAP4].
Except as noted otherwise, all alphabetic characters are case- insensitive. The use of upper or lower case characters to define token strings is for editorial clarity only. Implementations MUST accept these strings in a case-insensitive fashion.
Myers Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 2086 ACL extension January 1997
acl_data ::= "ACL" SPACE mailbox *(SPACE identifier SPACE rights)
deleteacl ::= "DELETEACL" SPACE mailbox SPACE identifier
getacl ::= "GETACL" SPACE mailbox
identifier ::= astring
listrights ::= "LISTRIGHTS" SPACE mailbox SPACE identifier
listrights_data ::= "LISTRIGHTS" SPACE mailbox SPACE identifier SPACE rights *(SPACE rights)
mod_rights ::= astring ;; +rights to add, -rights to remove ;; rights to replace
myrights ::= "MYRIGHTS" SPACE mailbox
myrights_data ::= "MYRIGHTS" SPACE mailbox SPACE rights
rights ::= astring
setacl ::= "SETACL" SPACE mailbox SPACE identifier SPACE mod_rights
An implementation must make sure the ACL commands themselves do not give information about mailboxes with appropriately restricted ACL's. For example, a GETACL command on a mailbox for which the user has insufficient rights should not admit the mailbox exists, much less return the mailbox's ACL.