This document is obsolete. Please
refer to RFC 7749.
Network Working Group M. Rose Request for Comments: 2629 Invisible Worlds, Inc. Category: Informational June 1999
Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This memo presents a technique for using XML (Extensible Markup Language) as a source format for documents in the Internet-Drafts (I-Ds) and Request for Comments (RFC) series.
Rose Informational [Page 1]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
This memo describes how to write a document for the I-D and RFC series using the Extensible Markup Language [1] (XML). This memo has three goals:
1. To describe a simple XML Document Type Definition (DTD) that is powerful enough to handle the simple formatting requirements of RFC-like documents whilst allowing for meaningful markup of descriptive qualities.
2. To describe software that processes XML source files, including a tool that produces documents conforming to RFC 2223 [2], HTML format, and so on.
3. To provide the proof-of-concept for the first two goals (this memo was written using this DTD and produced using that software).
It is beyond the scope of this memo to discuss the political ramifications of using XML as a source format for RFC-like documents. Rather, it is simply noted that adding minimal markup to plain text:
o allows the traditional production of textual RFC-like documents using familiar editors;
o requires some, albeit minimal, additions to existing software environments; and,
o permits information to be organized, searched, and retrieved using both unstructured and structured mechanisms.
Rose Informational [Page 3]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
We do not provide a formal or comprehensive description of XML. Rather, this section discusses just enough XML to use a Document Type Declaration (DTD) to write RFC-like documents.
If you're already familiar with XML, skip to Appendix B to look at the DTD.
There are very few rules when writing in XML, as the syntax is simple. There are five terms you'll need to know:
1. An "element" usually refers to a start tag, an end tag, and all the characters in between, e.g., "<example>text and/or nested elements</example>"
2. An "empty element" combines the start tag and the end tag, e.g., "<empty/>". You don't find these in HTML.
3. An "attribute" is part of an element. If present, they occur in the start tag, e.g., "<example name='value'>". Of course, they can also appear in empty elements, e.g., "<empty name='value'/>".
4. An "entity" is a textual macro that starts with "&". Don't worry about these, you'll only use them whenever you want to put a "&" or a "<" in your text.
5. A "token" is a string of characters. The first character is either a letter or an underscore ("_"). Any characters that follow are either letters, numbers, an underscore, or a period (".").
First, start your source file with an XML declaration, a reference to the DTD, and the "rfc" element:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd"> <rfc> ... </rfc>
Ignore the first two lines -- the declaration and the reference -- and simply treat them as opaque strings. Nothing else should be present after the "</rfc>" tag.
Second, make sure that all elements are properly matched and nested.
Rose Informational [Page 4]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
A properly matched element that starts with "<example>" is eventually followed with "</example>". (Empty elements are always matched.) Elements are properly nested when they don't overlap.
For example,
<outer> ... <inner> ... </inner> ... </outer>
is properly nested.
However,
<outer> ... <inner> ... </outer> ... </inner>
overlaps, so the elements aren't properly nested.
Third, never use "<" or "&" in your text. Instead, use either "<" or "&", respectively.
Fourth, there are two quoting characters in XML, 'apostrophe' and "quotation". Make sure that all attributes values are quoted, e.g., "<example name='value'>", If the value contains one of the quoting characters, then use the other to quote the value, e.g., "<example name='"'>", If the value contains both quoting characters, then use one of them to quote the value, and replace occurrances of that character in the attribute value with either ''' (apostrophe) or """ (quotation), e.g., "<example name='"'"'>".
If you want to put a comment in your source file, here's the syntax:
<!-- comments can be multiline, if you wish -->
Finally, XML is case sensitive.
Rose Informational [Page 5]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
(Note that in all examples, indentation is used only for expository purposes.)
The "front" element consists of a "title" element, one or more "author" elements, a "date" element, one or more optional "area" elements, one or more optional "workgroup" elements, one or more optional "keyword" elements, an optional "abstract" element. and, one or more optional "note" elements.
The "title" element identifies the title of the document. Because the title will be used in the headers of the document when formatted according to [2], if the title is more than 42 characters, then an abbreviation should also be provided, e.g.,
<title abbrev="Much Ado about Nothing"> The IETF's Discussion on "Source Format of RFC Documents" </title>
Rose Informational [Page 6]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
Each "author" element identifies a document author. Since a document may have more than one author, more than one "author" element may be present. If the author is a person, then three attributes must be present in the "<author>" tag, "initials", "surname", and "fullname", e.g.,
<author initials="M.T." surname="Rose" fullname="Marshall T. Rose">
The "author" element itself consists of an "organization" element, and, an optional "address" element.
The "organization" element is similar to the "title" element, in that an abbreviation may be paired with a long organization name using the "abbrev" attribute, e.g.,
<organization abbrev="ISI"> USC/Information Sciences Institute </organization>
The "address" element consists of an optional "postal" element, an optional "phone" element, an optional "facsimile" element, an optional "email" element, and, an optional "uri" element.
The "postal" element contains one or more "street" elements, followed by any combination of "city", "region" (state or province), "code" (zipcode or postal code), and "country" elements, e.g.,
This flexibility is provided to allow for different national formats for postal addresses. Note however, that although the order of the "city", "region", "code", and "country" elements isn't specified, at most one of each may be present. Regardless, these elements must not be re-ordered during processing by an XML application (e.g., display applications must preserve the ordering of the information contained in these elements). Finally, the value of the "country" element should be a two-letter code from ISO 3166.
Rose Informational [Page 7]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
The "phone", "facsimile", "email", and "uri" elements are simple, e.g.,
The "front" element may contain meta data -- the content of these elements does not appear in printed versions of the document.
A document has one or more optional "area", "workgroup" and "keyword" elements, e.g.,
<area>General</area> <workgroup>RFC Beautification Working Group</workgroup> <keyword>RFC</keyword> <keyword>Request for Comments</keyword> <keyword>I-D</keyword> <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword> <keyword>XML</keyword> <keyword>Extensible Markup Language</keyword>
The "area" elements identify a general category for the document (e.g., one of "Applications", "General", "Internet", "Management", "Operations", "Routing", "Security", "Transport", or "User"), while the "workgroup" elements identify the IETF working groups that produced the document, and the "keyword" elements identify useful search terms.
Rose Informational [Page 8]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
A document may have an "abstract" element, which contains one or more "t" elements (Section 2.3.1.1). In general, only a single "t" element is present, e.g.,
<abstract> <t>This memo presents a technique for using XML (Extensible Markup Language) as a source format for documents in the Internet-Drafts (I-Ds) and Request for Comments (RFC) series.</t> </abstract>
A document may have one or more "note" elements, each of which contains one or more "t" elements (Section 2.3.1.1). There is a mandatory "title" attribute. In general, the "note" element contains text from the IESG, e.g.,
<note title="IESG Note"> <t>The IESG has something to say.</t> </note>
Note that text relating to the memo's status, copyright notice, or table of contents is not included in the document's markup -- this is automatically inserted by an XML application when it produces either a text or HTML version of the document.
If an Internet-Draft is being produced, then the "ipr" attribute should be present in the "<rfc>" tag at the beginning of the file. The value of the attribute should be one of:
full2026: indicating that the document is in full conformance with all the provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026;
noDerivativeWorks2026: indicating that the document is in full conformance with all the provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026 except that the right to produce derivative works is not granted; or,
none: indicating that the document is NOT offered in accordance with Section 10 of RFC 2026, and the author does not provide the IETF with any rights other than to publish as an Internet-Draft.
Rose Informational [Page 9]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
In the latter case, a copyright notice will not be automatically inserted during processing by an XML application.
Consult [3] for further details.
Finally, if the Internet-Draft is being submitted to an automated process, then the "docName" attribute should be present in the "<rfc>" tag at the beginning of the file. The value of this attribute contains the document (not file) name associated with this Internet- Draft, e.g.,
<area>General</area> <workgroup>RFC Beautification Working Group</workgroup> <keyword>RFC</keyword> <keyword>Request for Comments</keyword> <keyword>I-D</keyword>
Rose Informational [Page 10]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
<keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword> <keyword>XML</keyword> <keyword>Extensible Markup Language</keyword> <abstract> <t>This memo presents a technique for using XML (Extensible Markup Language) as a source format for documents in the Internet-Drafts (I-Ds) and Request for Comments (RFC) series.</t> </abstract> </front>
Each "section" element contains a section of the document. There is a mandatory attribute, "title", that identifies the title of the section. There is also an optional attribute, "anchor", that is used for cross-referencing with the "xref" element (Section 2.3.1.4), e.g.,
The "t" element contains any number and combination of paragraphs, lists, and figures. If a cross-reference is needed to a section, figure, or reference, the "xref" element (Section 2.3.1.4) is used; similarly, if an external-reference is needed, the "eref" element (Section 2.3.1.5) is used. Indexing of text is provided by the the "iref" element (Section 2.3.1.6).
The "list" element contains one or more items. Each item is a "t" element, allowing for recursion, e.g.,
<list style="numbers"> <t>The pfirst item.</t> <t>The second item, which contains two bulleted sub-items: <list style="symbols"> <t>The first sub-item.</t> <t>The second sub-item.</t> </list> </t> </list>
The "list" element has an optional attribute, "style", having the value "numbers" (for numeric lists), "symbols" (for bulleted lists), "hanging" (for hanging lists), or, "empty" (for indented text). If a "list" element is nested, the default value is taken from its closest parent; otherwise, the default value is "empty".
Rose Informational [Page 12]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
When nested within a "hanging list" element, the "t" element has an optional attribute, "hangText" that specifies the text to be inserted, e.g.,
<list style="hanging"> <t hangText="full2026:">indicating that the document is in full conformance with all the provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026;</t>
<t hangText="noDerivativeWorks2026:">indicating that the document is in full conformance with all the provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026 except that the right to produce derivative works is not granted; or,</t>
<t hangText="none:">indicating that the document is NOT offered in accordance with Section 10 of RFC 2026, and the author does not provide the IETF with any rights other than to publish as an Internet-Draft.</t> </list>
The "figure" element groups an optional "preamble" element, an "artwork" element, and an optional "postamble" element together. The "figure" element also has an optional "anchor" attribute that is used for cross-referencing with the "xref" element (Section 2.3.1.4). There is also an optional "title" attribute that identifies the title of the figure.
The "preamble" and "postamble" elements, if present, are simply text. If a cross-reference is needed to a section, figure, or reference, the "xref" element (Section 2.3.1.4) is used; similarly, if an external-reference is needed, the "eref" element (Section 2.3.1.5) is used. Indexing of text is provided by the the "iref" element (Section 2.3.1.6).
The "artwork" element, which must be present, contains "ASCII artwork". Unlike text contained in the "t", "preamble", or "postamble" elements, both horizontal and vertical whitespace is significant in the "artwork" element.
Rose Informational [Page 13]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
So, putting it all together, we have, e.g.,
<figure anchor="figure_example"> <preamble>So, putting it all together, we have, e.g.,</preamble> <artwork> ascii artwork goes here...
be sure to use "<" or "&" instead of "<" and "&", respectively! </artwork> <postamble>which is a very simple example.</postamble> </figure>
which is a very simple example.
If you have artwork with a lot of "<" characters, then there's an XML trick you can use:
<figure> <preamble>If you have artwork with a lot of "<" characters, then there's an XML trick you can use:</preamble> <artwork><![CDATA[ ascii artwork goes here...
just don't use "]]" in your artwork! ]]></artwork> <postamble>The "<![CDATA[ ... ]]>" construct is called a CDATA block -- everything between the innermost brackets is left alone by the XML application.</postamble> </figure>
The "<![CDATA[ ... ]]>" construct is called a CDATA block -- everything between the innermost brackets is left alone by the XML application.
Because the "figure" element represents a logical grouping of text and artwork, an XML application producing a text version of the document should attempt to keep these elements on the same page. Because RFC 2223 [2] allows no more than 69 characters by 49 lines of content on each page, XML applications should be prepared to prematurely introduce page breaks to allow for better visual grouping.
Rose Informational [Page 14]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
Finally, the "artwork" element has two optional attributes: "name" and "type". The former is used to suggest a filename to use when storing the content of the "artwork" element, whilst the latter contains a suggestive data-typing for the content.
The "xref" element is used to cross-reference sections, figures, and references. The mandatory "target" attribute is used to link back to the "anchor" attribute of the "section", "figure", and "reference" elements. The value of the "anchor" and "target" attributes should be formatted according to the token syntax in Section 2.1.
If used as an empty element, e.g.,
according to the token syntax in <xref target="xml_basics" />.
then the XML application inserts an appropriate phrase during processing, such as "Section 2.1" or "<a href="#xml_basics">XML Basics</a>".
then the XML application inserts an appropriate designation during processing, such as "RFC 2223 [2]" or "<a href="#refs.RFC2223">RFC 2223</a>". Although the XML application decides what "an appropriate designation" might be, its choice is consistent throughout the processing of the document.
The "iref" element is used to add information to an index. The mandatory "item" attribute is the primary key the information is stored under, whilst the optional "subitem" attribute is the secondary key, e.g.,
<iref item="indexing" subitem="how to" />
Finally, note that the "iref" element is always empty -- it never contains any text.
The "vspace" element, which may occur only inside the "t" element, is used by the author to provide formatting guidance to the XML application. There is an attribute, "blankLines", that indicates the number of blank lines that should be inserted. A physical linebreak is specified by using the default value, "0".
In addition, the "vspace" element can be used to force a new physical paragraph within a list item, e.g.,
<list style="numbers"> <t>This is list item. <vspace blankLines="1" /> This is part of the same list item, although when displayed, it appears as a separate physical paragraph.</t> </list>
An XML application producing a text version of the document should exercise care when encountering a value for "blankLines" that causes a pagebreak -- in particular, if a "vspace" element causes a pagebreak, then no further blank lines should be inserted. This allows authors to "force" a pagebreak by using an arbitrarily large value, e.g., "blankLines='100'".
Finally, note that the "vspace" element is always empty -- it never contains any text.
Rose Informational [Page 16]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
The "back" element consists of an optional "references" element, and, one or more optional "section" elements. The "back" element itself is optional, if your document doesn't have any references or appendices, you don't have to include it.
The "reference" element also has an optional "target" attribute that is used for external references (c.f., Section 2.3.1.5). The XML application, if producing an HTML version of the document will use the "target" attribute accordingly; however, if the "name" attribute of the "seriesInfo" element has the value "RFC", then the XML application should automatically provide an appropriate default for the "target" attribute (e.g., "http://example.com/rfcs/rfc2200.txt").
To include appendices after the bibliography, simply add more "section" elements. (For an example, look at the example at the beginning of Section 2.4.)
The copyright status for the document is not included in the document's markup -- this is automatically inserted by an XML application that produces either a text or HTML version of the document.
Rose Informational [Page 18]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
3. Processing the XML Source File
This section concerns itself with applications that operate on an XML source file. A lot of XML tools are available, as are many lists of XML resources, e.g., Cafe con Leche [5].
There are two kinds of XML tools: validating and non-validating. Both check that the source file conforms to the rules given in Section 2.1. However, in addition to making sure that the source file is well-formed, a validating tool also reads the DTD referenced by the source file to make sure that they match. There are a number of both validating and non-validating tools available.
There are several XML editors available. Ideally, you want an editor that validates. This has two advantages:
o the editor provides guidance in fleshing-out the document structure; and,
o the editor validates that the source file matches the rules in the DTD.
There are two major modes in Emacs that support XML: tdtd [6] and psgml [7]. The latter mode allows you to validate the source file (by calling an external program). If you visit the source file in Emacs and the major mode isn't "SGML" or "XML", then usually all it takes is adding these lines to your ".emacs" file:
If your editor doesn't validate, then you should run a program to validate the source file.
The author uses the AlphaWorks XML parser [9] for this purpose. It requires that your system have a Java virtual machine. In addition to Java, there are validating parsers written in C, Perl, Python, and Tcl.
Rose Informational [Page 19]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
The author has written the xml2rfc tool [10], which reads the source file and produces both a text and HTML version of the document. (This memo was produced using the xml2rfc tool.) Note that xml2rfc isn't a validating tool, so it's a good idea to use either a validating editor or run a stand-alone validating parser prior to using the tool.
The XML Style Language (XSL) is used to describe transformations from the source file into some other structured file. So, ideally you should use an XSL-capable formatter to convert an XML source file to HTML.
However, as of this writing XSL is still in considerable flux. (Hence, no reference was included in this memo, as by the time you read this section, the reference would be outdated.) So, in the interim, the author uses the xml2rfc tool for this purpose, even though this tool doesn't provide much flexibility in its HTML layout.
As with text editors, any text-oriented search tool (e.g., grep) can be used on the source file. However, there are search tools available that understand structured source.
The author uses sgrep version 1.9 [11] for this purpose, e.g.
sgrep -g xml 'ELEMENTS("title") not in ELEMENTS("back")' \ writing-rfcs.xml
which extracts the title element from the source file.
Rose Informational [Page 20]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
This memo raises no security issues; however, according to [2], your document should contain a section near the end that discusses the security considerations of the protocol or procedures that are the main topic of your document, e.g.,
<middle> ... <section title="Security Considerations"> <t>This memo raises no security issues; however, according to <xref target="refs.RFC2223" />, your document should contain a section near the end that discusses the security considerations of the protocol or procedures that are the main topic of your document.</t> </section> </middle>
Rose Informational [Page 21]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
References
[1] World Wide Web Consortium, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0", W3C XML, February 1998.
[2] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Instructions to RFC Authors", RFC 2223, October 1997.
[3] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.
[4] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396, August 1998.
The "<rfc>" tag at the beginning of the file, with only an "ipr" attribute (Section 2.2.7.1), produces an Internet-Draft. However, when other attributes are added to this tag by the RFC editor, an RFC is produced, e.g.,
At a minimum, the "number" attribute should be present.
The other attributes are:
o "obsoletes", having a comma-separated list of RFC numbers, that the document obsoletes;
o "updates", having a comma-separated list of RFC numbers, that the document updates;
o "category", having one of these values:
1. "std", for a Standards-Track document;
2. "bcp", "for a Best Current Practices document;
3. "exp", for an Experimental Protocol document;
4. "historic", for a historic document; or,
5. "info", the default, for an Informational document.
o "seriesNo", having the corresponding number in the STD (std), BCP (bcp), or FYI (info) series.
Finally, a special entity, "&rfc.number;", is available. Authors preparing an RFC should use this entity whenever they want to reference the number of the RFC within the document itself. In printed versions of the document, the appropriate substitution (or "XXXX") will occur.
Rose Informational [Page 23]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
<!-- at most one of each the city, region, code, and country elements may be present --> <!ELEMENT postal (street+,(city|region|code|country)*)> <!ELEMENT street (%CTEXT;)> <!ELEMENT city (%CTEXT;)> <!ELEMENT region (%CTEXT;)> <!ELEMENT code (%CTEXT;)> <!ELEMENT country (%CTEXT;)> <!ELEMENT phone (%CTEXT;)> <!ELEMENT facsimile (%CTEXT;)> <!ELEMENT email (%CTEXT;)> <!ELEMENT uri (%CTEXT;)>
<!ELEMENT date EMPTY> <!ATTLIST date day %DAY; #IMPLIED month %MONTH; #REQUIRED year %YEAR; #REQUIRED>
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
<!ELEMENT section (t|figure|section)*> <!ATTLIST section anchor ID #IMPLIED title %ATEXT; #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT t (%TEXT;|list|figure|xref|eref|iref|vspace)*> <!ATTLIST t hangText %ATEXT; #IMPLIED>
<!-- the value of the style attribute is inherited from the closest parent --> <!ELEMENT list (t+)> <!ATTLIST list style (numbers|symbols|hanging|empty) "empty">
The author gratefully acknowledges the contributions of: Alan Barrett, Brad Burdick, Brian Carpenter, Steve Deering, Patrik Faltstrom, Jim Gettys, Carl Malamud, Chris Newman, Kurt Starsinic, and, Frank Strauss.
Rose Informational [Page 29]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
Index
I indexing how to 16
Rose Informational [Page 30]
RFC 2629 Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML June 1999
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.