This document is obsolete. Please
refer to RFC 4227.
Network Working Group E. O'Tuathail Request for Comments: 3288 Clipcode.com Category: Standards Track M. Rose Dover Beach Consulting, Inc. June 2002
Using the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) in Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP)
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This memo specifies a Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) binding to the Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol core (BEEP). A SOAP binding describes how SOAP messages are transmitted in the network.
The SOAP is an XML-based (extensible markup language) messaging protocol used to implement a wide variety of distributed messaging models. It defines a message format and describes a variety of message patterns, including, but not limited to, RPC, asynchronous event notification, unacknowledged messages, and forwarding via SOAP intermediaries.
This memo specifies how SOAP 1.1 envelopes[1] are transmitted using a BEEP profile[2]. In the W3C, the XMLP effort is evolving SOAP. Accordingly, this memo provides a mechanism for negotiating the use of new features.
Throughout this memo, the term "envelope" refers to the "SOAP- Env:Envelope" element defined in Section 4 of [1]. Further, the terms "peer", "client", "server", "one-to-one", and "one-to-many" are used in the context of BEEP. In particular, Sections 2.1 and 2.1.1 of [2] discuss BEEP roles and exchange styles.
in the BEEP "profile" element during channel creation.
In BEEP, when the first channel is successfully created, the "serverName" attribute in the "start" element identifies the "virtual host" associated with the peer acting in the server role, e.g.,
The "serverName" attribute is analagous to HTTP's "Host" request- header field (c.f., Section 14.23 of [3]).
There are two states in the BEEP profile for SOAP, "boot" and "ready":
o In the "boot" state, the peer requesting the creation of the channel sends a "bootmsg" (either during channel initialization or in a "MSG" message).
* If the other peer sends a "bootrpy" (either during channel initialization or in a "RPY" message), then the "ready" state is entered
* Otherwise, the other peer sends an "error" (either during channel initialization or in a "ERR" message), then no state change occurs.
o In the "ready" state, either peer begins a SOAP message pattern by sending a "MSG" message containing an envelope. The other peer completes the message pattern either by:
* sending back a "RPY" message containing an envelope; or,
* sending back zero or more "ANS" messages, each containing an envelope, followed by a "NUL" message.
<!ELEMENT bootrpy EMPTY> <!ATTLIST bootrpy features NMTOKENS "">
The boot message contains a mandatory and an optional attribute:
o the "resource" attribute, which is analagous to HTTP's "abs_path" Request-URI parameter (c.f., Section 5.1.2 of [3]); and,
o the "features" attribute, which, if present, contains one or more feature tokens, each indicating an optional feature of the BEEP profile for SOAP that is being requested for possible use over the channel.
Section 6.1 defines a registration template for optional features.
If the peer acting in the server role recognizes the requested resource, it replies with the boot response that contains one optional attribute:
o the "features" attribute, if present, contains a subset of the feature tokens in the boot message, indicating which features may be used over the channel. (If not present or empty, then no features may be used.)
Otherwise, if the boot message is improperly formed, or if the requested resource isn't recognized, the peer acting in the server role replies with an error message (c.f., Section 7.1 of [2]).
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
Typically, the boot message and its response are exchanged during channel initialization (c.f., Section 2.3.1.2 of [2]).
For example, here the boot message and its response are exchanged during channel initialization:
In addition, the BEEP profile for SOAP also allows envelopes to be transmitted as the root part of a "multipart/related"[5] content, and with subordinate parts referenced using the rules of Section 3 of [6] (i.e., using either the "Content-ID:"[7] or "Content-Location:"[8] headers), e.g.,
Consistent with Section 2 of [6], it is strongly recommended that the multipart contain a "start" parameter, and that the root part contain a "Content-ID:" header. However, because BEEP provides an 8bit-wide path, a "transformative" Content-Transfer-Encoding (e.g., "base64" or "quoted-printable") should not be used. Further note that MIME[9] requires that the value of the "Content-ID" header be globally unique.
A one-way message involves sending a message without any response being returned.
The BEEP profile for SOAP achieves this using a one-to-many exchange, in which the client sends a "MSG" message containing an envelope, and the server immediately sends back a "NUL" message, before processing the contents of the envelope.
A request/response exchange involves sending a request, which results in a response being returned.
The BEEP profile for SOAP achieves this using a one-to-one exchange, in which the client sends a "MSG" message containing an envelope, and the server sends back a "RPY" message containing an envelope.
Finally, the BEEP profile for SOAP does not use the "ERR" message for SOAP faults when performing one-to-one exchanges -- whatever response is generated by the server is always returned in the "RPY" message.
A request/N-responses exchange involves sending a request, which results in zero or more responses being returned.
The BEEP profile for SOAP achieves this using a one-to-many exchange, in which the client sends a "MSG" message containing an envelope, and the server sends back zero or more "ANS" messages, each containing an envelope, followed by a "NUL" message.
This memo defines two URL schemes, "soap.beep" and "soap.beeps", which identify the use of SOAP over BEEP over TCP. Note that, at present, a "generic" URL scheme for SOAP is not defined.
The "soap.beep" URL scheme indicates the use of the BEEP profile for SOAP running over TCP/IP.
If the authority component contains a domain name and a port number, e.g.,
soap.beep://stockquoteserver.example.com:1026
then the DNS is queried for the A RRs corresponding to the domain name, and the port number is used directly.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
If the authority component contains a domain name and no port number, e.g.,
soap.beep://stockquoteserver.example.com
the SRV algorithm[11] is used with a service parameter of "soap-beep" and a protocol parameter of "tcp" to determine the IP/TCP addressing information. If no appropriate SRV RRs are found (e.g., for "_soap- beep._tcp.stockquoteserver.example.com"), then the DNS is queried for the A RRs corresponding to the domain name and the port number used is assigned by the IANA for the registration in Section 7.4.
If the authority component contains an IP address, e.g.,
soap.beep://10.0.0.2:1026
then the DNS is not queried, and the IP address is used directly. If a port number is present, it is used directly; otherwise, the port number used is assigned by the IANA for the registration in Section 7.4.
While the use of literal IPv6 addresses in URLs is discouraged, if a literal IPv6 address is used in a "soap.beep" URL, it must conform to the syntax specified in [12].
The "soap.beeps" URL scheme is identical, in all ways, to the "soap.beep" URL scheme specified in Section 5.1, with the exception that prior to starting the BEEP profile for SOAP, the BEEP session must be tuned for privacy. In particular, note that both URL schemes use the identical algorithms and parameters for address resolution as specified in Section 5.1.1 (e.g., the same service name for SRV lookups, the same port number for TCP, and so on).
There are two ways to perform privacy tuning on a BEEP session, either:
o a transport security profile may be successfully started; or,
o a user authentication profile that supports transport security may be successfully started.
Regardless, upon completion of the negotiation process, a tuning reset occurs in which both BEEP peers issue a new greeting. Consult Section 3 of [2] for an example of how a BEEP peer may choose to issue different greetings based on whether privacy is in use.
When a feature for the BEEP profile for SOAP is registered, the following information is supplied:
Feature Identification: specify a string that identifies this feature. Unless the feature is registered with the IANA, the feature's identification must start with "x-".
Feature Semantics: specify the semantics of the feature.
Contact Information: specify the electronic contact information for the author of the feature.
for both: http://iana.org/beep/TLS (using the TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA cipher supporting client-side certificates)
Further, implementations may choose to offer MIME-based security services providing message integrity and confidentiality, such as OpenPGP[13] or S/MIME[14].
Regardless, consult [2]'s Section 9 for a discussion of BEEP-specific security issues.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
References
[1] Box, D., Ehnebuske, D., Kakivaya, G., Layman, A., Mendelsohn, N., Nielsen, H., Thatte, S. and D. Winer, "Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1", May 2000, <http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/ NOTE-SOAP-20000508>.
[2] Rose, M., "The Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol Core", RFC 3080, March 2001.
[3] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Nielsen, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P. and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.
[4] Murata, M., St.Laurent, S. and D. Kohn, "XML Media Types", RFC 3023, January 2001.
[5] Levinson, E., "The MIME Multipart/Related Content-type", RFC 2387, August 1998.
[6] Barton, J., Thatte, S. and H. Nielsen, "SOAP Messages with Attachments", December 2000, <http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE- SOAP-attachments-20001211>.
[7] Levinson, E., "Content-ID and Message-ID Uniform Resource Locators", RFC 2392, August 1998.
[8] Palme, F., Hopmann, A., Shelness, N. and E. Stefferud, "MIME Encapsulation of Aggregate Documents, such as HTML (MHTML)", RFC 2557, March 1999.
[9] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies", RFC 2045, November 1996.
[10] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396, August 1998.
[11] Gulbrandsen, A., Vixie, P. and L. Esibov, "A DNS RR for specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)", RFC 2782, February 2000.
[12] Haskin, D. and E. Allen, "IP Version 6 over PPP", RFC 2472, December 1998.
[13] Elkins, M., Del Torto, D., Levien, R. and T. Roessler, "MIME Security with OpenPGP", RFC 3156, August 2001.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
[14] Ramsdell, B., "S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification", RFC 2633, June 1999.
IANA Considerations
The IANA has registered the profile specified in Section 7.1 as:
The IANA has registered "soap.beep" and "soap.beeps" as URL schemes, as specified in Section 7.2 and Section 7.3, respectively.
The IANA has also registered "SOAP over BEEP" as a TCP port number, as specified in Section 7.4.
Finally, the IANA maintains a list of SOAP profile features, c.f., Section 6.1. The IESG is responsible for assigning a designated expert to review the specification prior to the IANA making the assignment. Prior to contacting the IESG, developers of SOAP profile features must use the mailing list beepwg@lists.beepcore.org to solicit commentary.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of: Christopher Ferris, Huston Franklin, Alexey Melnikov, Bill Mills, and Roy T. Fielding.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
Authors' Addresses
Eamon O'Tuathail Clipcode.com 24 Thomastown Road Dun Laoghaire Dublin IE
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.