Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) R. Housley Request for Comments: 7107 Vigil Security Category: Informational January 2014 ISSN: 2070-1721
Object Identifier Registry for the S/MIME Mail Security Working Group
Abstract
When the S/MIME Mail Security Working Group was chartered, an object identifier arc was donated by RSA Data Security for use by that working group. This document describes the object identifiers that were assigned in that donated arc, transfers control of that arc to IANA, and establishes IANA allocation policies for any future assignments within that arc.
Status of This Memo
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7107.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Housley Informational [Page 1]
RFC 7107 S/MIME OID Registry January 2014
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................2 2. Subordinate Object Identifier Arcs ..............................3 3. IANA Considerations .............................................4 3.1. Update to "SMI Security for Mechanism Codes" Registry ......4 3.2. "SMI Security for S/MIME Mail Security" Registry ...........4 3.3. "SMI Security for S/MIME Module Identifier" Registry .......5 3.4. "SMI Security for S/MIME CMS Content Type" Registry ........6 3.5. "SMI Security for S/MIME Attributes" Registry ..............7 3.6. "SMI Security for S/MIME Algorithms" Registry ..............9 3.7. "SMI Security for S/MIME Certificate Distribution Mechanisms" Registry .......................................9 3.8. "SMI Security for S/MIME Signature Policy Qualifier" Registry .......................................10 3.9. "SMI Security for S/MIME Commitment Type Identifier" Registry ......................................10 3.10. "SMI Security for S/MIME Test Security Policies" Registry .................................................10 3.11. "SMI Security for S/MIME Control Attributes for Symmetric Key Distribution" Registry .....................11 3.12. "SMI Security for S/MIME Signature Type Identifiers" Registry ....................................11 3.13. "SMI Security for S/MIME X.400 Encoded Information Types (EIT) for S/MIME objects" Registry .................12 3.14. "SMI Security for S/MIME Capabilities (other than cryptographic algorithms)" Registry ......................12 3.15. "SMI Security for S/MIME Portable Symmetric Key Container (PSKC) Attributes" Registry ....................12 4. Security Considerations ........................................13 5. References .....................................................13 5.1. Normative References ......................................13 5.2. Informative References ....................................14 6. Acknowledgements ...............................................18
When the S/MIME Mail Security Working Group was chartered, an object identifier arc was donated by RSA Data Security for use by that working group. These object identifiers are primarily used with Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) [ASN1-88] [ASN1-08]. The ASN.1 specifications continue to evolve, but object identifiers can be used with any and all versions of ASN.1.
This document describes the object identifiers that were assigned in that donated arc, transfers control of that arc to IANA, and establishes IANA allocation policies for any future assignments within that arc.
IANA is asked to update one registry table and create fourteen additional tables.
Updates to the new tables require both Specification Required and Expert Review as defined in [RFC5226]. The expert is expected to ensure that any new values are strongly related to the work that was done by the S/MIME Mail Security Working Group; examples include content types, attributes, and identifiers for algorithms used with S/MIME and CMS. Object identifiers for other purposes should not be assigned in this arc.
3.1. Update to "SMI Security for Mechanism Codes" Registry
The "SMI Security for Mechanism Codes" table generally contains entries with a positive integer value, but the value donated by RSA Data Security cannot be described in this manner. An accompanying table is needed with this entry:
OID Value Name Description References --------------------- ----- --------------------- ---------- 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16 smime S/MIME Mail Security This RFC
3.2. "SMI Security for S/MIME Mail Security" Registry
Within the SMI-numbers registry, add an "SMI Security for S/MIME Mail Security (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16)" table with three columns:
Decimal Description References ------- -------------------------------------- ---------- 0 Module identifiers This RFC 1 CMS content types This RFC 2 Attributes This RFC 3 Algorithm identifiers This RFC 4 Certificate distribution This RFC 5 Signature policy qualifiers This RFC 6 Commitment type identifiers This RFC 7 Test security policies This RFC 8 Symmetric key dist ctrl attrs This RFC 9 Signature type identifiers This RFC 10 Encoded information types This RFC 11 S/MIME capabilities This RFC 12 PSKC attributes This RFC
Housley Informational [Page 4]
RFC 7107 S/MIME OID Registry January 2014
Future updates to this table require both Specification Required and Expert Review as defined in [RFC5226].
3.3. "SMI Security for S/MIME Module Identifier" Registry
Within the SMI-numbers registry, add an "SMI Security for S/MIME Module Identifier (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.0)" table with three columns:
Future updates to this table require both Specification Required and Expert Review as defined in [RFC5226].
3.7. "SMI Security for S/MIME Certificate Distribution Mechanisms" Registry
Within the SMI-numbers registry, add an "SMI Security for S/MIME Certificate Distribution Mechanisms (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.4)" table with three columns:
Future updates to this table require both Specification Required and Expert Review as defined in [RFC5226].
Housley Informational [Page 10]
RFC 7107 S/MIME OID Registry January 2014
3.11. "SMI Security for S/MIME Control Attributes for Symmetric Key Distribution" Registry
Within the SMI-numbers registry, add an "SMI Security for S/MIME Control Attributes for Symmetric Key Distribution (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.8)" table with three columns:
Future updates to this table require both Specification Required and Expert Review as defined in [RFC5226].
Housley Informational [Page 11]
RFC 7107 S/MIME OID Registry January 2014
3.13. "SMI Security for S/MIME X.400 Encoded Information Types (EIT) for S/MIME objects" Registry
Within the SMI-numbers registry, add an "SMI Security for X.400 Encoded Information Types (EIT) for S/MIME objects (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.10)" table with three columns:
Future updates to this table require both Specification Required and Expert Review as defined in [RFC5226].
3.14. "SMI Security for S/MIME Capabilities (other than cryptographic algorithms)" Registry
Within the SMI-numbers registry, add an "SMI Security for S/MIME Capabilities (other than cryptographic algorithms) (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.11)" table with three columns:
Within the SMI-numbers registry, add an "SMI Security for S/MIME Portable Symmetric Key Container (PSKC) Attributes (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.12)" table with three columns:
This document populates an IANA registry, and it raises no new security considerations. The protocols that specify these values include the security considerations associated with their usage.
[ASN1-08] International Telecommunication Union, "Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation", ITU-T Recommendation X.680, 2008.
[ASN1-88] International Telephone and Telegraph Consultative Committee, "Specification of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1)", CCITT Recommendation X.208, 1988.
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, May 2008.
[MTS-in-CMS] Housley, R., "Use of the Hash-based Merkle Tree Signature (MTS) Algorithm in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", Work in Progress, August 2013.
[RFC2630] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax", RFC 2630, June 1999.
[RFC2633] Ramsdell, B., Ed., "S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification", RFC 2633, June 1999.
[RFC2634] Hoffman, P., Ed., "Enhanced Security Services for S/MIME", RFC 2634, June 1999.
[RFC3029] Adams, C., Sylvester, P., Zolotarev, M., and R. Zuccherato, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Data Validation and Certification Server Protocols", RFC 3029, February 2001.
[RFC3114] Nicolls, W., "Implementing Company Classification Policy with the S/MIME Security Label", RFC 3114, May 2002.
[RFC3125] Ross, J., Pinkas, D., and N. Pope, "Electronic Signature Policies", RFC 3125, September 2001.
[RFC3126] Pinkas, D., Ross, J., and N. Pope, "Electronic Signature Formats for long term electronic signatures", RFC 3126, September 2001.
[RFC3161] Adams, C., Cain, P., Pinkas, D., and R. Zuccherato, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP)", RFC 3161, August 2001.
Housley Informational [Page 14]
RFC 7107 S/MIME OID Registry January 2014
[RFC3183] Dean, T. and W. Ottaway, "Domain Security Services using S/MIME", RFC 3183, October 2001.
[RFC3185] Farrell, S. and S. Turner, "Reuse of CMS Content Encryption Keys", RFC 3185, October 2001.
[RFC3211] Gutmann, P., "Password-based Encryption for CMS", RFC 3211, December 2001.
[RFC3274] Gutmann, P., "Compressed Data Content Type for Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 3274, June 2002.
[RFC3369] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 3369, August 2002.
[RFC3370] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Algorithms", RFC 3370, August 2002.
[RFC3537] Schaad, J. and R. Housley, "Wrapping a Hashed Message Authentication Code (HMAC) key with a Triple-Data Encryption Standard (DES) Key or an Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key", RFC 3537, May 2003.
[RFC3560] Housley, R., "Use of the RSAES-OAEP Key Transport Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 3560, July 2003.
[RFC3565] Schaad, J., "Use of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 3565, July 2003.
[RFC3657] Moriai, S. and A. Kato, "Use of the Camellia Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 3657, January 2004.
[RFC3851] Ramsdell, B., Ed., "Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.1 Message Specification", RFC 3851, July 2004.
[RFC3852] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 3852, July 2004.
[RFC3855] Hoffman, P. and C. Bonatti, "Transporting Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Objects in X.400", RFC 3855, July 2004.
Housley Informational [Page 15]
RFC 7107 S/MIME OID Registry January 2014
[RFC4049] Housley, R., "BinaryTime: An Alternate Format for Representing Date and Time in ASN.1", RFC 4049, April 2005.
[RFC4073] Housley, R., "Protecting Multiple Contents with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 4073, May 2005.
[RFC4108] Housley, R., "Using Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) to Protect Firmware Packages", RFC 4108, August 2005.
[RFC4211] Schaad, J., "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF)", RFC 4211, September 2005.
[RFC4998] Gondrom, T., Brandner, R., and U. Pordesch, "Evidence Record Syntax (ERS)", RFC 4998, August 2007.
[RFC5055] Freeman, T., Housley, R., Malpani, A., Cooper, D., and W. Polk, "Server-Based Certificate Validation Protocol (SCVP)", RFC 5055, December 2007.
[RFC5083] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Authenticated-Enveloped-Data Content Type", RFC 5083, November 2007.
[RFC5084] Housley, R., "Using AES-CCM and AES-GCM Authenticated Encryption in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 5084, November 2007.
[RFC5126] Pinkas, D., Pope, N., and J. Ross, "CMS Advanced Electronic Signatures (CAdES)", RFC 5126, March 2008.
[RFC5272] Schaad, J. and M. Myers, "Certificate Management over CMS (CMC)", RFC 5272, June 2008.
[RFC5275] Turner, S., "CMS Symmetric Key Management and Distribution", RFC 5275, June 2008.
[RFC5485] Housley, R., "Digital Signatures on Internet-Draft Documents", RFC 5485, March 2009.
[RFC5544] Santoni, A., "Syntax for Binding Documents with Time- Stamps", RFC 5544, February 2010.
Housley Informational [Page 16]
RFC 7107 S/MIME OID Registry January 2014
[RFC5649] Housley, R. and M. Dworkin, "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap with Padding Algorithm", RFC 5649, September 2009.
[RFC5752] Turner, S. and J. Schaad, "Multiple Signatures in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 5752, January 2010.
[RFC5753] Turner, S. and D. Brown, "Use of Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Algorithms in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 5753, January 2010.
[RFC5755] Farrell, S., Housley, R., and S. Turner, "An Internet Attribute Certificate Profile for Authorization", RFC 5755, January 2010.
[RFC5911] Hoffman, P. and J. Schaad, "New ASN.1 Modules for Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) and S/MIME", RFC 5911, June 2010.
[RFC5914] Housley, R., Ashmore, S., and C. Wallace, "Trust Anchor Format", RFC 5914, June 2010.
[RFC5958] Turner, S., "Asymmetric Key Packages", RFC 5958, August 2010.
[RFC5990] Randall, J., Kaliski, B., Brainard, J., and S. Turner, "Use of the RSA-KEM Key Transport Algorithm in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 5990, September 2010.
[RFC6010] Housley, R., Ashmore, S., and C. Wallace, "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Content Constraints Extension", RFC 6010, September 2010.
[RFC6031] Turner, S. and R. Housley, "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Symmetric Key Package Content Type", RFC 6031, December 2010.
[RFC6032] Turner, S. and R. Housley, "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Encrypted Key Package Content Type", RFC 6032, December 2010.
[RFC6210] Schaad, J., "Experiment: Hash Functions with Parameters in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) and S/MIME", RFC 6210, April 2011.
[RFC6268] Schaad, J. and S. Turner, "Additional New ASN.1 Modules for the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) and the Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX)", RFC 6268, July 2011.
[RFC6476] Gutmann, P., "Using Message Authentication Code (MAC) Encryption in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 6476, January 2012.
[RFC6482] Lepinski, M., Kent, S., and D. Kong, "A Profile for Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs)", RFC 6482, February 2012.
[RFC6486] Austein, R., Huston, G., Kent, S., and M. Lepinski, "Manifests for the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)", RFC 6486, February 2012.
[RFC6493] Bush, R., "The Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Ghostbusters Record", RFC 6493, February 2012.
[RFC7030] Pritikin, M., Ed., Yee, P., Ed., and D. Harkins, Ed., "Enrollment over Secure Transport", RFC 7030, October 2013.
[SET-KEY] Herzog, J. and R. Khazan, "A set-key attribute for symmetric-key packages", Work in Progress, October 2012.