RFC 8602






Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          J. Arkko
Request for Comments: 8602                                      Ericsson
Updates: 3219                                                  T. Hardie
Category: Standards Track                                      July 2019
ISSN: 2070-1721


   Update to the Telephony Routing over IP (TRIP) IANA Registry Rules
                       regarding Postal Addresses

Abstract



   This memo updates the IANA registry rules for the Telephony Routing
   over IP (TRIP) protocol, by no longer requiring that postal addresses
   be included in contact information.

   This memo updates RFC 3219.

Status of This Memo



   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8602.

Copyright Notice



   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.





Arkko & Hardie               Standards Track                    [Page 1]

RFC 8602                  TRIP Registry Update                 July 2019


Table of Contents



   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   4.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3

1.  Introduction



   This memo updates the IANA registry rules for the Telephony Routing
   over IP (TRIP) protocol, by no longer requiring that postal addresses
   be included in contact information.  No use for the addresses is
   identified, and omitting this information provides a privacy benefit.

   This memo updates RFC 3219.

2.  IANA Considerations



   This memo updates the registration rules [RFC8126] for TRIP
   Attributes ([RFC3219], Section 13.2) and TRIP IP Telephony
   Administrative Domain (ITAD) Numbers ([RFC3219], Section 13.5) as
   follows.

   The IETF no longer requires IANA to collect postal address
   information when adding TRIP registry entries.  Additionally, IANA
   has removed previously collected postal addresses from the
   registries.

3.  Security Considerations



   No security impacts of this change have been identified.

4.  Normative References



   [RFC3219]  Rosenberg, J., Salama, H., and M. Squire, "Telephony
              Routing over IP (TRIP)", RFC 3219, DOI 10.17487/RFC3219,
              January 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3219>.

   [RFC8126]  Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
              Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
              RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.







Arkko & Hardie               Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 8602                  TRIP Registry Update                 July 2019


Acknowledgements



   The authors would like to thank Michelle Cotton, Alissa Cooper, and
   Jonathan Rosenberg for interesting discussions in this problem space.
   The authors would also like to thank Carlos Pignataro, Russ Housley,
   Abdussalam Baryun, and Paul Wouters for feedback.

Authors' Addresses



   Jari Arkko
   Ericsson
   Kauniainen  02700
   Finland

   Email: jari.arkko@piuha.net


   Ted Hardie

   Email: ted.ietf@gmail.com































Arkko & Hardie               Standards Track                    [Page 3]